Comparison of Smartphone Technology using AHP, ELECTRE, and PROMETHEE Methods
DOI:
10.33395/sinkron.v8i2.13085Keywords:
AHP, ELECTRE, Multi-criteria, PROMETHEE, SmartPhone.Abstract
The progress of smartphone technology is now very rapid, supported by many renewable features, even many users are competing to get the latest products without regard to the costs that have been incurred. The problem that arises is that it is increasingly difficult to select technology-based products with many criteria. The purpose of writing this paper is to provide the best solution for selecting technology-based products with multi-criteria to suit user needs by taking into account the costs incurred effectively and the use of contradictory multi-criteria applications. The presence of technology products always has many criteria that make it more difficult for users to choose products as the right choice according to their needs, thus the right method is needed as a solution to obtain technology-based products such as smartphones. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method is used for the evaluation and selection process. This AHP method will collaborate with the ELECTRE and PROMETHEE methods as a comparison solution for smartphone product selection. The resulting comparison will be an applied model for smartphone selection that produces the best decision-making support according to user needs. The results of the collaborative implementation process of the ELECTRE and PROMETHEE methods provide a decision on the rating system. The collaborative application of the AHP method to the ELECTRE and PROMETHEE methods provides optimal decision support for the selection process, so that this can be used as a comparison material in making decisions regarding the selection of smartphones as technology-based products.
Downloads
References
Akinlalu, A. A., Olayanju, G. M., Adiat, K. A. N., & Omosuyi, G. O. (2021). Mineralisation potential assessment using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) modeling technique: A case study of Ilesha schist belt, southwestern Nigeria. Results in Geophysical Sciences, 7(January), 100026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ringps.2021.100026
Akmaludin, A., Hartati, T., Purwanto, H., & Sukendar, T. (2020). The Best Selection of Programmers in Generation 4 . 0 Using AHP and ELECTRE Elimination Methods The Best Selection of Programmers in Generation 4 . 0 Using AHP and ELECTRE Elimination Methods. Journal Conference Series, 0–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1477/3/032001
Akram, M., Luqman, A., Carlos, J., & Alcantud, R. (2022). An integrated ELECTRE-I approach for risk evaluation with hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy information. Expert Systems With Applications, 200(May 2021), 116945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116945
Akram, M., Noreen, U., & Deveci, M. (2023). Enhanced ELECTRE II method with 2-tuple linguistic m-polar fuzzy sets for multi-criteria group decision making. Expert Systems with Applications, 213(PC), 119237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119237
Apostolou, B., & Hassell, J. M. (2002). Note on consistency ratio: A reply. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 35(9–10), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-7177(02)00071-7
Aschenbrenner, M. (2012). Logarithms of iteration matrices, and proof of a conjecture by Shadrin and Zvonkine. Journal of Combinatorial Theory. Series A, 119(3), 627–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcta.2011.11.008
Corrente, S., Greco, S., & SŁowiński, R. (2013). Multiple Criteria Hierarchy Process with ELECTRE and PROMETHEE. Omega (United Kingdom), 41(5), 820–846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2012.10.009
da Cunha, R. A., Rangel, L. A. D., Rudolf, C. A., & Santos, L. dos. (2022). A decision support approach employing the PROMETHEE method and risk factors for critical supply assessment in large-scale projects. Operations Research Perspectives, 9(April), 100238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orp.2022.100238
Erdogan, S. A., Šaparauskas, J., & Turskis, Z. (2017). Decision Making in Construction Management: AHP and Expert Choice Approach. Procedia Engineering, 172, 270–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.02.111
Hamidah, M., Mohd Hasmadi, I., Chua, L. S. L., Yong, W. S. Y., Lau, K. H., Faridah-Hanum, I., & Pakhriazad, H. Z. (2022). Development of a protocol for Malaysian Important Plant Areas criterion weights using Multi-criteria Decision Making - Analytical Hierarchy Process (MCDM-AHP). Global Ecology and Conservation, 34(October 2021), e02033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2022.e02033
Iyengar, K., Upadhyaya, G. K., Vaishya, R., & Jain, V. (2020). COVID-19 and applications of smartphone technology in the current pandemic. Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews, 14(5), 733–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2020.05.033
John, B., McCreary, C., & Roberts, A. (2022). Smartphone technology for communications between clinicians – A scoping review. Journal of Dentistry, 122(April), 104112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104112
Lacruz, M., León-Saavedra, F., Petrovic, S., & Rodríguez-Piazza, L. (2021). Extended eigenvalues of composition operators. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 504(2), 125427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2021.125427
Lopes, A. P. F., Muñoz, M. M., & Alarcón-Urbistondo, P. (2018). Regional tourism competitiveness using the PROMETHEE approach. Annals of Tourism Research, 73(December 2017), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2018.07.003
Marhavilas, P. K., Filippidis, M., Koulinas, G. K., & Koulouriotis, D. E. (2022). Safety-assessment by hybridizing the MCDM/AHP & HAZOP-DMRA techniques through safety’s level colored maps: Implementation in a petrochemical industry. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 61(9), 6959–6977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.12.040
Ogonowski, P. (2022). Integrated AHP and TOPSIS Method in the Comparative Analysis of the Internet Activities. Procedia Computer Science, 207, 4409–4418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.09.504
Pagliuca, M. M., & Scarpato, D. (2014). The Olive Oil Sector: A Comparison between Consumers and “experts” Choices by the Sensory Analysis. Procedia Economics and Finance, 17(14), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(14)00897-1
Palczewski, K., & Sałabun, W. (2019). Influence of various normalization methods in PROMETHEE II: An empirical study on the selection of the airport location. Procedia Computer Science, 159, 2051–2060.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.378
Panchal, S., & Shrivastava, A. K. (2022). Landslide hazard assessment using analytic hierarchy process (AHP): A case study of National Highway 5 in India. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 13(3), 101626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2021.10.021
Radomska-Zalas, A. (2022). The AHP method in the optimization of the epoxidation of allylic alcohols. Procedia Computer Science, 207, 456–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.09.100
Song, J., Yao, J., & Yuan, W. (2022). Recent advances on eigenvalues of matrix-valued stochastic processes. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 188, 104847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmva.2021.104847
Xu, Y., & Wang, H. (2013). Eigenvector method, consistency test and inconsistency repairing for an incomplete fuzzy preference relation. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(7), 5171–5183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2012.10.008
Zhang, R., Gao, C., Chen, X., Li, F., Yi, D., & Wu, Y. (2023). Genetic algorithm optimised Hadamard product method for inconsistency judgement matrix adjustment in AHP and automatic analysis system development. Expert Systems with Applications, 211(August 2022), 118689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118689
Zhao, Y., & Deng, C. (2022). Analysis of project benefit of solar energy collection and irrigation system based on AHP. Energy Reports, 8, 122–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.05.085
Downloads
|
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Akmaludin, Adhi Dharma Suriyanto , Kudiantoro Widianto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Muhammad Khoiruddin harahap
Google Scholar 
Moraref
PKP Index
Garuda Kemdikbud
Indonesia OneSearch
OCLC Worldcat
Dimensions
Index Copernicus
Scilit
